Welcome to the Prison Talk Online Community! Take a Minute and Sign Up Today!






Go Back   Prison Talk > U.S. REGIONAL FORUMS > NEW JERSEY > New Jersey News & Events
Register Entertainment FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

New Jersey News & Events Current news items and information on events related to the New Jersey prison system.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-07-2016, 04:57 PM
fbopnomore fbopnomore is offline
Site Moderator

PTO Site Moderator Staff Superstar Winner 

Donation Award 
 

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,000
Thanks: 30,968
Thanked 15,569 Times in 9,462 Posts
Default Christie vetos no solitary under age 21 law

Here's a link to an article from NorthJersey.com, part of USA Today's network.

Christie vetoed the law that would have restricted solitary confinement for prisoners under age 21 in New Jersey prisons, calling it a “partisan and juvenile” attempt by Democratic lawmakers to drum up headlines.

http://www.northjersey.com/story/new...ment/95004976/
__________________
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to fbopnomore For This Useful Post:
patchouli (12-07-2016)
Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 12-07-2016, 05:04 PM
patchouli's Avatar
patchouli patchouli is offline
PTO Administrator

PTOQ Editorial Team Member Staff Superstar Two Time Winner Staff Superstar Winner 

Donation Award 
 

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 34,470
Thanks: 33,734
Thanked 26,459 Times in 12,403 Posts
Default

I saw that in my Facebook feed Chris Christie is xx xxx..I try to keep my political views from being so apparent. Sometimes I can, sometimes I can't I do hope that there is an avenue for overriding his veto.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-07-2016, 05:22 PM
Tina's Avatar
Tina Tina is offline
It made me stronger- Mod

PTO Moderator 

Donation Award 
 

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 4,872
Thanks: 2,606
Thanked 1,998 Times in 1,234 Posts
Default

That's a shame. This would have at least been a step in the right direction.
__________________
There is always something beautiful in everyday... You just have to find it.
-Unknown


Romans 8:28 Jeremiah 29:11






Moderator: New Jersey, Juvenile, Prison Activism, Connecticut, Delaware, Massachusetts, Arkansas, Maryland
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Tina For This Useful Post:
patchouli (12-07-2016)
  #4  
Old 12-07-2016, 07:19 PM
CenTexLyn CenTexLyn is offline
Registered User
 

Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: TX-US
Posts: 12,766
Thanks: 327
Thanked 8,127 Times in 4,795 Posts
Default

Contrary to what some believe, this sort of legislation is an attempt to micromanage corrections through legislation. That deprives the people who are purportedly the experts in security operations from being able to do their job properly. The simple reality is that some persons, regardless of age, MUST be kept separate from the general population in order to ensure the safety and security of both staff AND other offenders.

Put another way...if a PTO member has a spouse, child or friend that is housed on a facility with a person certified as an adult and who has displayed assaultive tendencies and who in turn causes harm to the spouse, child or friend, I can only imagine the hue and cry about why the agency had not taken steps to isolate the juvenile from the general population.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CenTexLyn For This Useful Post:
Ms Sunny (12-09-2016), safran (12-08-2016)
  #5  
Old 12-07-2016, 09:45 PM
Mrs. Iimas Mrs. Iimas is offline
Registered User
 

Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: New York USA
Posts: 1,251
Thanks: 0
Thanked 682 Times in 388 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CenTexLyn View Post
Contrary to what some believe, this sort of legislation is an attempt to micromanage corrections through legislation. That deprives the people who are purportedly the experts in security operations from being able to do their job properly. The simple reality is that some persons, regardless of age, MUST be kept separate from the general population in order to ensure the safety and security of both staff AND other offenders.

Put another way...if a PTO member has a spouse, child or friend that is housed on a facility with a person certified as an adult and who has displayed assaultive tendencies and who in turn causes harm to the spouse, child or friend, I can only imagine the hue and cry about why the agency had not taken steps to isolate the juvenile from the general population.
There has to be a better way than solitary. Animals are treated better than the conditions in solitary. Solitary confinement is cruel. Children should not be put in a room for days weeks months alone. The trauma it causes is terrible. My boyfriend has told me countless experiences he had as a child in prison being sent to solitary. It's horrific. He was sent to solitary for arguing or talking back. It seems like an abuse of the punishment.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-08-2016, 05:58 AM
CenTexLyn CenTexLyn is offline
Registered User
 

Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: TX-US
Posts: 12,766
Thanks: 327
Thanked 8,127 Times in 4,795 Posts
Default

Did you read what I wrote for the example of persons who need to be removed from a general population? There are some who simply MUST be kept from regular abilities to intermingle with staff AND offenders in order to keep those other persons safe.

Or perhaps you would rather your boyfriend be harmed by one of those under-21's who just doesn't give a damn about life or who or what he does to other people but who cannot be isolated because we might harm his delicate fee-fees.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CenTexLyn For This Useful Post:
Ms Sunny (12-09-2016), safran (12-08-2016)
  #7  
Old 12-08-2016, 08:53 AM
Mrs. Iimas Mrs. Iimas is offline
Registered User
 

Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: New York USA
Posts: 1,251
Thanks: 0
Thanked 682 Times in 388 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CenTexLyn View Post
Did you read what I wrote for the example of persons who need to be removed from a general population? There are some who simply MUST be kept from regular abilities to intermingle with staff AND offenders in order to keep those other persons safe.

Or perhaps you would rather your boyfriend be harmed by one of those under-21's who just doesn't give a damn about life or who or what he does to other people but who cannot be isolated because we might harm his delicate fee-fees.
Yes I did read what you wrote and I still feel like solitary is harsh and cruel. I feel that practice of using it for punishment is overly used. There has to be a better way to treat mentally ill children who are in prison. The system is broken I don't have the answers or even know where to begin on how it could be fixed. It's my opinion and I'm entitled to it. Putting a child does a lot more harm than just hurting their feelings.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-09-2016, 05:51 AM
CenTexLyn CenTexLyn is offline
Registered User
 

Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: TX-US
Posts: 12,766
Thanks: 327
Thanked 8,127 Times in 4,795 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs. Iimas View Post
Yes I did read what you wrote and I still feel like solitary is harsh and cruel. I feel that practice of using it for punishment is overly used. There has to be a better way to treat mentally ill children who are in prison. The system is broken I don't have the answers or even know where to begin on how it could be fixed. It's my opinion and I'm entitled to it. Putting a child does a lot more harm than just hurting their feelings.
And without a 'better way,' segregation remains the ONLY way to deal with SOME offenders for the sake of the safety of other offenders (you know, like your boyfriend) and staff (who some here don't give a damn about).
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CenTexLyn For This Useful Post:
Ms Sunny (12-09-2016)
  #9  
Old 12-09-2016, 12:04 PM
yourself yourself is offline
attorney
 

Join Date: May 2010
Location: around
Posts: 10,567
Thanks: 3,538
Thanked 17,509 Times in 6,447 Posts
Default

Personally, I'd much rather have a law in place that mandates a certain level of education and training for wardens on down to new corrections officers.

I'd outlaw private prisons except in unusual circumstances - a private prison with max to min units for trans and gender conflicted individuals, or a medium prison solely for natives of one of a handful of tribes that caters to the individual needs of members of those tribes - stuff like that. Such prisons would be nonprofits with the onus of the prison's creation and maintenance placed on some outside community dedicated to people in that sort of field - so a tribe or conglomeration of tribes could open up a prison for their people(s) instead of some generic, profit driven prison.

I do think that young offenders, specifically those under 30, should be housed together, and that some offenders will push boundaries either deliberately or because they can't help themselves. Solitary is sometimes necessary, no matter how young. It really sucks. They do need to have their cases reviewed more regularly than at present in most prisons, and they should have distinct goals to meet to get out of solitary when it comes to prisoners for whom long term solitary confinement is warranted.

But yeah, CenTex is right - sometimes solitary, including long term solitary, is warranted for people at any age. Want to reduce solitary? increase the mental health beds in our communities so that some of these people are treated for their psychological difficulties rather than imprisoned. But, even mental hospitals use isolation and 4 point restraints on people, no matter the age.

I guess the other question to ask is whether you want to increase the use of involuntary medication on inmates, especially those under 25. Medication, of course, is then seen as the invisible restraint system that may be more humane according to those of us on the outside looking in, but is eschewed by those in the psych rights communities. Especially when court ordered and against the will of the individual.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to yourself For This Useful Post:
miamac (12-09-2016), Ms Sunny (12-09-2016)
  #10  
Old 12-09-2016, 02:23 PM
Mrs. Iimas Mrs. Iimas is offline
Registered User
 

Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: New York USA
Posts: 1,251
Thanks: 0
Thanked 682 Times in 388 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CenTexLyn View Post
And without a 'better way,' segregation remains the ONLY way to deal with SOME offenders for the sake of the safety of other offenders (you know, like your boyfriend) and staff (who some here don't give a damn about).
The problem is the "some" who should be put into solitary because there is no other option are not the only ones who are thrown into solitary. especially when it comes to children in prison. There are many instances where the use of solitary is abused as these children suffer long term effects because of it. My bf still suffers from trauma from being put into solitary as a child.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Mrs. Iimas For This Useful Post:
Tina (12-09-2016)
  #11  
Old 12-09-2016, 07:39 PM
CenTexLyn CenTexLyn is offline
Registered User
 

Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: TX-US
Posts: 12,766
Thanks: 327
Thanked 8,127 Times in 4,795 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs. Iimas View Post
The problem is the "some" who should be put into solitary because there is no other option are not the only ones who are thrown into solitary. especially when it comes to children in prison. There are many instances where the use of solitary is abused as these children suffer long term effects because of it. My bf still suffers from trauma from being put into solitary as a child.
What happened in the past is not reason to legislatively micromanage and hamstring an agency. I cannot help but to notice you continue to avoid the response you would have if one of those juveniles who doesn't give a damn and should be isolated were to harm your boyfriend...apparently you would be perfectly fine with that because heaven forbid we place an assaultive individual in a single-cell environment for the sake of protecting others from harm.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-10-2016, 10:01 AM
Mrs. Iimas Mrs. Iimas is offline
Registered User
 

Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: New York USA
Posts: 1,251
Thanks: 0
Thanked 682 Times in 388 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CenTexLyn View Post
What happened in the past is not reason to legislatively micromanage and hamstring an agency. I cannot help but to notice you continue to avoid the response you would have if one of those juveniles who doesn't give a damn and should be isolated were to harm your boyfriend...apparently you would be perfectly fine with that because heaven forbid we place an assaultive individual in a single-cell environment for the sake of protecting others from harm.
Honestly I'm not worried about an inmate harming my boyfriend. He can take care of himself. I still feel solitary is overused on children. It's my opinion and I'm entitled to it. I can't help but wonder why these juveniles don't give a damn. Maybe that should be addressed but again I'm not worried about my man. He's good he can take care of himself
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gov. Scott vetos early release for non-violent ... burntfingers Florida News & Events 32 06-06-2012 11:14 AM
Intro--~Christie~ from Michigan ~Christie~ Introduce Yourself! 5 03-28-2011 10:32 PM
Christie Michelle Scott lisainengland Death Row & Capital Punishment Discussions 1 07-14-2009 07:24 AM
Governor Vetos key bills to reform. Morris1 California Prison & Criminal Justice News & Events + 3 Strikes 28 10-15-2007 05:59 PM
Gov. Perry's Line Item Vetos ParoledIn98 Texas General Prison Talk 2 06-17-2007 10:21 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:17 AM.
Copyright © 2001- 2013 Prison Talk Online
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Website Design & Custom vBulletin Skins by: Relivo Media
Message Board Statistics