Welcome to the Prison Talk Online Community! Take a Minute and Sign Up Today!

Go Back   Prison Talk > RESOURCE CENTER > Prison & Criminal Legal Help!
Register Entertainment FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

Prison & Criminal Legal Help! Ask questions, get opinions, and find resources on dealing with criminal justice legal issues, appeals, and more..

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-06-2016, 06:46 PM
Levi2729 Levi2729 is offline
Registered User

Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Missouri, United States
Posts: 1
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Post Sex Offender Appeal & MOSOP


Question - is it true you cannot appeal your sex offender case without forfeiting your right to the MOSOP program?

I have a question regarding access into the MOSOP. It is my understanding that the accused has 2 chances to accept entry into this program. If the accused denies both times, they are no longer eligible for the program unless the Parole Board applies for a 3rd consideration.

In our particular case, the accused had taken his case to the appeal process. During the appeals process, he was not able to accept nor deny entry into the program. He did not state that he did not want to enroll in the program, rather, that his case was in the appeals court and would have to wait until completion. However, because his case was in appeals court they (DOC) said that the accused denied entry into the program twice, preventing him from getting into the program.

The reason the accused was appealing the case, of course, was because he felt he is innocent. If he had withdrawn his case and then accepted the program, that is in a sense admitting guilt - which he did not want to do.
I feel this is completely unethical and simply not right. The accused should be able to execute his right of appealing his case without being punished.

Current standings on this case: the parole board did submit for him to be readmitted into the MOSOP, but it was denied. He is now onward to serving his max sentence.

I appreciate your help & guidance.

Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 11-06-2016, 07:18 PM
patchouli's Avatar
patchouli patchouli is online now
PTO Administrator

PTOQ Editorial Team Member Staff Superstar Two Time Winner Staff Superstar Winner 

Donation Award 

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 38,341
Thanks: 38,588
Thanked 31,381 Times in 14,497 Posts

I can't answer your questions, but I do want to welcome you to PTO.

Somehow it just doesn't make sense that if an offender is in some stage of a court process, even an appeal, that there should be an adverse DOC action

But I'm not an attorney. Hopefully someone will be along with information that will actually help

Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to patchouli For This Useful Post:
Levi2729 (05-18-2017)
Old 11-06-2016, 10:45 PM
yourself yourself is offline

Join Date: May 2010
Location: around
Posts: 11,711
Thanks: 4,167
Thanked 20,935 Times in 7,376 Posts

Here's the basic reasoning as I understand it:

1. an appeal based on innocence means that the offender is not taking responsibility for his crime

2. responsibility for the crime, an examination of the crime, understanding the stressors and thinking patterns of the individual that led to committing the crime are integral parts of the program

3. there are a limited number of spaces available in the program, so "auditing" the program (think sitting through it without doing it, or even being able to contribute to group discussions) takes a space away from an offender who wants to complete the program as a full participant.

4. "auditing" the program would not give the offender the treatment completion necessary to lower his out date

Look, this happens all the time especially with parole board matters - the first thing the parole board wants to hear is remorse, and remorse means taking responsibility for the crime, acknowledging the damage caused by the crime, and taking steps to make sure that such a crime never happens again. When there's an appeal pending, such remorse cannot be expressed by an offender as he cannot take responsibility for a crime he's still stating that he didn't commit. Same thing here. Same thing with other programs for other crimes.

Is he being penalized? Maybe. But the courts do not look at it that way. Program options based on elements of remorse and treatment cannot be done by somebody still stating that he didn't commit the crime. Plenty of people serve their max time for other reasons as well. Sucks that he's sentenced to so short a time that the appeals process interferes with his ability to take responsibility for his crime, but if he truly believes he's innocent, he shouldn't be taking the course anyway - he'll just have a treatment failure added to his risk assessment at the end of his sentence, and that can nudge him up on that risk level.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to yourself For This Useful Post:
Levi2729 (05-18-2017), patchouli (11-07-2016), sidewalker (11-07-2016)


appeals process, mosop denial

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mosop lostinmissouri Missouri Prison and Jail Specific Discussions 5 03-23-2015 09:21 PM
Missouri Sex Offender Program (MOSOP) Christy Missouri Prison & Jail Visitation, Phones, Packages & Mail 27 11-07-2013 11:28 AM
Habitual offender appeal bella Prison Legislation & Laws 3 12-07-2004 11:24 PM
Habitual offender wins partial appeal bella Florida News & Events 0 12-02-2004 09:25 PM

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:57 PM.
Copyright © 2001- 2017 Prison Talk Online
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Website Design & Custom vBulletin Skins by: Relivo Media
Message Board Statistics