Welcome to the Prison Talk Online Community! Take a Minute and Sign Up Today!






Go Back   Prison Talk > CAPITAL PUNISHMENT > Death Row - What you need to know!
Register Entertainment FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

Death Row - What you need to know! General and State Specific questions/answers about Death Row - mail & more - whatever you need to know can probably be found here!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-07-2003, 11:25 PM
38special 38special is offline
Call it like I see it.
 

Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Gadsden, Alabama
Posts: 389
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Default Death-Row Inmates Prefer Death to Life

- South Carolina appellate attorney Joe Savitz did everything he could to try to prevent the execution of Michael Passaro - not necessarily because he believed in his innocence, but because Passaro wanted to die.


Last September, Passaro was executed for the 1998 death of his daughter. Passaro was in a custody dispute with his second wife in November 1998 when he doused his van with gasoline, strapped 2-year-old daughter Maggie inside and then sat down in his car before lighting it on fire. However, before the fire could consume him, Passaro jumped out of the car but left Maggie to die.

Passaro pleaded guilty to murder in 2000 and requested — and received — the death penalty. Passaro did not, and never wanted, to appeal his guilty plea, and rejected his attorneys' attempts to help him.

Savitz argued that Passaro should not be executed because he would see it as a reward, not punishment. Passaro, Savitz said, had a long-standing death wish to join his first wife, who was killed in 1992 when a car struck her while she was trying to help an accident victim.

"He does not see the death sentence as punishment. He sees it as an escape from punishment," Savitz said before Passaro's lethal injection. "He believes that he will be reunited with his first wife and the child that he killed, Maggie. He wants to die and has gotten the state to help him carry it out in what is essentially a state-assisted suicide. He is not doing this because he feels a sense of remorse."

According to the Death Penalty Information Center, a group opposed to capital punishment, Passaro's execution was one of seven "volunteer" executions in 2002, where death-row prisoners relinquished their remaining appeals and opted to be put to death.

More death-row inmates have been volunteering for their executions: Between 1993 and 2002, 75 volunteered for death, compared to the 22 consensual executions between 1977 and 1992. (Gary Gilmore, the first prisoner put to death after the Supreme Court reinstituted capital punishment in 1976, "volunteered" for his execution in 1977 because he did not want to live the rest of his life on death row.)

Some critics argue that this shows that, contrary to popular belief, death is not the ultimate punishment for prisoners.

"One could argue that life in prison is the worst kind of punishment and not the death penalty," said Richard Dieter, DPIC's executive director. "So many people wouldn't be volunteering for it if it was so bad."

Death Row’s Psychological Torture

Over the past 10 years, more death-row inmates have preferred execution to facing seemingly endless years of appeals. Some inmates had been on death row for more than 10 years and seemed to grow tired of appealing their cases, not knowing when or if they were going to die. Others, like Passaro and Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh in 2001, chose not to pursue their appeals either at all or to their fullest extent.

Experts say prison conditions as well as increasing reluctance by governors and courts to grant clemency and appellate relief to inmates have helped fuel the rise in volunteer executions.

"There are an increasing number of states where the only alternative to the death penalty is life without the possibility of parole. I believe that is true in 35 out of the 38 states where the death penalty is available," said Michael Radelet, professor of sociology at the University of Colorado. "For a lot of the prisoners on death row, they are becoming well aware that they are going to die in prison [either through execution or commuted death sentence]."


Radelet also points out that prison conditions have not given inmates much reason to want to live longer on death row. Many live in isolation, allowed out of their cells for only an hour a day. Time allotted for activities for death-row inmates has dwindled. And, some experts argue, as human conditions on death row have diminished, so have prisoners' sense of humanity and will to live.

"In a number of states over the past 10 years, the amount of recreational activities for death-row inmates has decreased, for example, materials for hobbies, art, knitting," Radelet said. "In some prisons in Florida, they have replaced the bars with Plexiglas, making the pain of imprisonment, the harshness of prison conditions that much more."

The Myth of ‘Volunteer’ Executions

Still, death-penalty advocates say there is no such thing as a volunteer execution. No one, they argue, is on death row because they want to be. They went through a legal process to land on death row where they were arrested by law enforcement, convicted and sentenced by either a judge or jury.

"That is such a misnomer," said Dianne Clements, executive director of Justice for All, a Houston-based victims' advocates group. "There is no such thing [as a consensual execution] … it is a phrase coined by those who would oppose the death penalty. … It's just not true. Why can't death-penalty opponents call it what it is: a prisoner's decision to end his appellate process."


Clements indicated that there is some irony to death-penalty opponents suggesting that life in prison would be a more humane sentence than capital punishment. Some death-penalty opponents claim to be concerned about preserving the dignity of death-row inmates and not resorting to barbaric methods to punish murderers. But at the same time, they suggest that a life sentence — which they admit could be a punishment worse than death — would be better for the prisoners they are trying to help.

"It just shocks me that death-penalty opponents would want a crueler form of punishment for inmates. Give me a break," Clements said. "It's not like most of them [death-row inmates] suddenly have an epiphany and decide to end the appellate process. Most have been on death row for years.

Why can't we call it what it really is?" Clements continued. "That some prisoners just seem to accept responsibility for what they have done and are just ready for it [the death penalty]. Some accept responsibility, some do not. Anti-death-penalty advocates and defense counsel are doing a disservice and dismissing and minimalizing the actions of the people they claim to be protecting by doing what they do."

Ongoing Fight for Proper Closure

Clements acknowledges that some inmates do not go through 20 years of legal battles, and opt to accept death almost immediately — they plead guilty to murder, request and receive the death penalty and choose not to pursue any appeals. These cases especially, some experts maintain, show that many prisoners have death wishes and are using law enforcement officials to help them carry out their suicides.

Some death-row prisoners suffer from mental illness and depression and may admit to things that things they didn't do. Allowing volunteer executions, critics say, empowers prisoners, allowing them to essentially schedule their deaths … and escape accountability, not embrace it.

"It's interesting, we've put Jack Kevorkian in jail for that kind of thing," said Renny Cushing, executive director of Murder Victims' Families for Reconciliation. "In part, it [volunteer executions] allows the state to participate in state-assisted suicides."

"It goes back to the very act of the crime itself, the murder," said Radelet. "That's where you find these guys do not value themselves, who waive mitigation, fire their attorneys, plead guilty to murder and ask for the death penalty."

It is difficult to predict whether the number of volunteer executions will continue to rise. The DPIC's Dieter suggests there should be limits placed on punishment — that perhaps the ultimate fate of a death-row prisoner must be determined by the legal system after a certain amount of time. If the time limit runs out, Dieter says, then the prisoner should receive an automatic life sentence.

"The state has an interest in getting it right, and the families have a right to get some closure, instead of going through years and years of their tragedy being revisited," Dieter said.

But what kind of closure do victims' families want? One guarantee is that the debate over the death penalty and its effectiveness will go on as prisoners continue to volunteer for lethal injection and DNA evidence casts doubt over some capital murder convictions.

Before he leaves office on Jan. 13, Illinois Gov. George Ryan, who has placed a moratorium on executions in his state, is expected to make a decision on whether some of the 160 condemned inmates will receive clemency. The Illinois Prisoner Review Board reportedly has recommended clemency for fewer than 10 of the 140 death-row prisoners who have requested that their sentences be commuted to life in prison.

Excerpt from ABC news tonight.

What are your thoughts why prisoners choose DP over fighting their cases? 38 Special
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 01-08-2003, 10:16 AM
lulu's Avatar
lulu lulu is offline
Been here forever
 

Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Tx.
Posts: 9,966
Thanks: 76
Thanked 330 Times in 53 Posts
Default

it is indeed an emotional roller coaster for them, i do not not believe in DP,, but i cant say i cant see where they are coming from.
__________________
many hugs
lulu
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-08-2003, 01:42 PM
B-Ray's Avatar
B-Ray B-Ray is offline
Da Ole Goat
 

Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Philippines
Posts: 4,546
Thanks: 0
Thanked 10 Times in 7 Posts
Default

This is very hard to view from the outside looking in.

What I have learned since being at PTO, that when a person arrives on death row, they are viewed as a non-salvagable human and treated as such with basic housing, food and water.

The basic trait of humanity is servival, but when there is found no purpose to live, I "think" I understand why some would prefer to leave this life as we know it, when there is no hope left.

Presently, our society in general, views a person on death row as a throw-a-way human, worthless, no value and a waste of money, to keep them alive. A person can take only so much rejection, before they succomb to there fate as the mass's within our society has deemed nessessary.

Death for those, is a means to an end and there only "hope" for anything possible.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-08-2003, 02:37 PM
softheart softheart is offline
Register
Donation Award 
 

Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Washington State
Posts: 10,795
Thanks: 30
Thanked 193 Times in 75 Posts
Default

After working with 800+ on the row and also with having a loved one executed. I can tell you DR is a very lonely place. Depending on which State but most of them are like living in Hell. Texas is a good example of Hell, they are house in small solid cells, that are not meant to be perminate hpousing. It was meant to be a holding cell for 30 days or so. They are in there with no TV no nothing, no phone calls, no art supplies. Where Tracy was it also was Hell, freezing, standing in sewer. They are emotional beat down and physically beat down. After a while it gets to many, and finally the feel it is better to die and finally get out of the hell they are in.
I have some that will never give up, because they refuse to let the State win.
DR is made so they can break them down and want them to give up.

I have heard from all the ones I deal with that don't have family or someone on the outside. There isn't a night they don't go to bed hungry and cold or burning up with the heat.

Most States they are not allowed contact at all with other human beings. There are a few states left that do, but not many.

For a person to be housed in total sensory deprivation, no contact with other and not even having your basic needs met. Will break down a person in time and they finally say enough is enough.

Try sitting in your closet with the door shut and see how long you last. Except we know we can get out of there anytime we want.

softie
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-08-2003, 04:49 PM
lupine lupine is offline
Registered User
 

Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 101
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

yea, i have to say that oddly this is a topic i have ponder a great deal...i've often heard execution refered to as euthanasia and knowing what i know i do understand. i would not want to live in that way..
i talked with my hubby about this topic more than once and he says several things...
* that he fears the kind of person he will become if he lives his whole life in there...
*that he doesn't want to live 20 years hoping that it is not gonna happen, knowing it is...
*that if he is going to be killed he would rather choose when...
*that once he is dead he can be on the outside, in the spirit world and at least watch over me and the kids instead of being a burden..
and the one i know but it is unspoken...that his pain will be ended.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-08-2003, 08:51 PM
Jeni's Avatar
Jeni Jeni is offline
"Betty" Fan
 

Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Motown baby!
Posts: 2,789
Thanks: 0
Thanked 14 Times in 11 Posts
Default

Are we SO evil that we want people to pay for all eternity? "We" are going to execute you because you have done horrible, horrible things. "We" want you to suffer everyday of your life knowing that you WILL be executed one of these days. BUT don't you DARE ask to be executed because we don't want you to think that you are going to get out of this by dying!!!
WTF??? So the man wants to die because he thinks he will be reunited with his first wife and daughter that he killed. Who knows what happens after death and how ridiculous is it to say that BECAUSE this guy (who we are planning on killing anyways right?) actually has hope for his soul in the afterlife, that he should be kept alive, for now, just for spite. We just don't want him to THINK that his soul will one day be free! We want DR inmates to suffer, so if they DON'T want to fight to live, then we will make sure they DO live, for now. I don't get it. Which way is it guys? Do we only want to put them to death because it scares the hell out of most human beings? Or do we want to keep them alive because that is worse. If they DON'T want to die, then execute them, but if they are willing to go, then keep 'em alive? I don't understand.
__________________
Pray for the Soul of Betty ROCKS!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Exonerated (latest case added was 2011) softheart Death Row & Capital Punishment Discussions 6 01-04-2012 03:37 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:08 PM.
Copyright © 2001- 2017 Prison Talk Online
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Website Design & Custom vBulletin Skins by: Relivo Media
Message Board Statistics